Legal Opinion
Andrews v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1946No. 11635PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Andrews was convicted under-18 U.S.C.A. § 72, of possessing and uttering three forged automobile tire certificates,. knowing them to be forged. The sole point presented by this appeal is whether the evidence authorized the jury to find that he knew the certificates were forged. The evidence was that during the recent period of tire rationing the rationing boards issued to the tire users certificates which when a tire was bought were endorsed and delivered to the authorized tire dealers. The dealers in turn could use the “replacement portion” of the certificates with the tire makers…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. Di CarloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Zottarelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Bruce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- August Tom Rizzo v. United States of America, Ruby Nafie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Wallace David EleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Fitzgerald LovellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Jack Stanley, Thomas A. Warren, Isom Meyers, and Hubert Stanley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Ben Herbert SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.