Legal Opinion

United States v. Di Carlo

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 3, 1933No. 329PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The statute reads: “Whoever 'shall transport or cause to be transported in interstate or foreign commerce a motor vehicle, knowing the same to have been stolen, shall be punished; * * *•” and “Whoever shall receive, conceal, store, barter, sell, or dispose of any motor vehicle, moving as, or which is a part of, or which constitutes interstate or foreign commerce, knowing the same to have been stolen, shall be punished. * * * ” U. S. C. title 18, § 408 (18 USCA § 408).

While the offenses of transporting a motor vehicle in interstate commerce and of receiving,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Rosen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. Davidson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Boehm v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  5. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. AgueciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. People v. BostickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. United States v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  4. United States v. StrombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API