Legal Opinion

Detroit Safe Co. v. Myer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1916No. Docket No. 59PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Saginaw; Kendrick, J. Replevin by Detroit Safe Company against Frank J. Myer for possession of a safe sold on contract. Judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPerson, J.

This is an action of replevin brought to recover possession of a safe delivered by plaintiff *216to defendant under contract of sale. The contract is in the form of an order, signed by defendant, and _ reads as follows:

“5 — 13—1914.
“Detroit Safe Co.,
“Detroit, Mich.
“You will please ship me when notified one of your No. 60 fireproof safes with corner chest with combination lock. For this safe delivered on board of cars at Saginaw will pay you $225.00, terms cash. If change of color is decided on must have 4 weeks’ notice. Paint French Grey. Name, Myer Bros. And in consideration of the delivery of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. SnowMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Adams v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Anderson v. PendlMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Myers v. SawvelMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API