Anderson v. Pendl
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Newaygo; Palmer, J. Replevin by Thomas A. Anderson against Peter Pendí. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff brought replevin for a span of horses which at the time of the issue of the writ were in the custody of the defendant, Peter Pendí. He claims that he had made an agreement with Paul Pendí, the brother of Peter, that he would sell to him (Paul) this team for $200; that he had advertised the team for sale on the 11th of May, and that whatever price he was forced to pay at the auction he should have the team for $200; that Paul wanted to use the horses at once, and he loaned them to him with the understanding that he would return them upon the 11th. He claims to have agreed to take…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Detroit Safe Co. v. MyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Myers v. SawvelMichigan Supreme Court · 1922