Legal Opinion

Palace Hotel Co. v. Crist

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1935No. Civ. 9660PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

On January 5, 1912, a judgment was entered in action No. 38324 of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, wherein the above-named Palace Hotel Company, a corporation, was the plaintiff, and George J. Dempsey, J. H. Tuttle and Wiley F. Crist were the defendants. Said judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, Wiley F. Crist, in the sum of $2,126.14, together with legal interest thereon from date until paid. On March 1, 1912, a judgment was entered against the two other defendants in the sum of $850 and $12.05 costs. This…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Saunders v. SimmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Faias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Hovey v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Demens v. HueneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rappenecker v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Taylor v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. McClelland v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Sohn v. California Pacific Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Long v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API