Legal Opinion · Dissent

Balch v. Leader Federal Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 20, 1993No. 92-1100Published

1Dissent

Eugene Hunt, Special Chief Justice,

dissenting. The majority takes the position that the fee interest owned by a lessor cannot be the subject of a foreclosure decree, regardless of the facts, unless the holder of that fee interest signs or authorizes another to execute a mortgage encumbering the fee interest.

On September 10, 1992, the chancery judge found that Leader Federal Bank for Savings (Leader Federal) the lender to The Crestwood Company, the lessee, had a right to foreclosure upon the fee interest held by Beverly Balch Price and Memory B. Balch (the Balches) even though, the Balches,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. Lorraine Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Rose v. DunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API