State v. McElroy
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Dissent
*392Dissenting Opinion by
NAKAMURA, J.
I agree with the majority’s distinction between prosecutorial misconduct and prosecu-torial error. Trial lawyers are required to make countless judgment calls under the stress and pressure of trial. A judgment call that we later determine on appeal to have been made in error should not be labeled “misconduct” simply because it was made by a prosecutor.1 Instead, as this opinion properly recognizes, the label of “prosecutorial misconduct,” with its attendant disciplinary repercussions, should be limited to dishonest and deceitful acts made in bad faith.
I also…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- State v. FurutaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GanalHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LoaHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- The People v. KirkwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.