Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. McElroy

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2004No. 25190Published

1Dissent

*392Dissenting Opinion by

NAKAMURA, J.

I agree with the majority’s distinction between prosecutorial misconduct and prosecu-torial error. Trial lawyers are required to make countless judgment calls under the stress and pressure of trial. A judgment call that we later determine on appeal to have been made in error should not be labeled “misconduct” simply because it was made by a prosecutor.1 Instead, as this opinion properly recognizes, the label of “prosecutorial misconduct,” with its attendant disciplinary repercussions, should be limited to dishonest and deceitful acts made in bad faith.

I also…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. State v. FurutaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. GanalHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. LoaHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. The People v. KirkwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API