Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 2, 1915No. 5458PublishedCited by 13 opinions

• Error. from County Court, Carter County; W. F. Freeman, Judge. Action by M. L. • Alexander against Edward R. Holmes and Ralph W. ■■ Holmes,. surviving partners of the firm of R. E. Holmes & Sons. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This action was originally commenced in a justice of the peace court. On appeal to the county court it was tried to the court and a jury, and a verdict returned for the plaintiff. Judgment was rendered on the verdict as follows:

“It is therefore ordered, decreed, and adjudged by the court that M. L. Alexander, the plaintiff herein, do-have and recover of and from R. E. Holmes, Ralph W. Holmes, and Edward R. Holmes, the’ defendants herein, jointly and severally, the sum of $200, .together with all costs herein. To the above judgment the defendants in open court except.”

A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heaton v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Symms Grocer Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. Sayre Commission Co. v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Holmes v. DillardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. Farnum WifeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Southard v. Oil Equipment CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. Fowler v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. St. Louis Trading Co. v. BarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Choi v. TurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API