Newberry v. Meadows Fertilizer Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
Tbe judgment overruling tbe demurrer of tbe defendant, Meadows Fertilizer Company, to tbe complaint in this action, is affirmed on tbe authority of Trust Co. v. Peirce, 195 N. C., 717, 143 S. E., 524. Speaking of tbe complaint in tbat case, it is said; “A connected story is told, and a complete picture is painted of a series of transactions, forming one general scheme, and tending to a single end. This saves tbe pleading from tbe challenge of tbe demurrer.” This principle is applicable to tbe allegations of tbe complaint in this action, and for this reason tbe demurrer was properly overruled.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. PeirceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Fenner v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Newberry v. Davison Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- In Re Davison Chemical Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1936
- Newberry v. Meadows Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Newberry v. Meadows Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Smith v. McDowell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941