Legal Opinion

Smith v. McDowell Furniture Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.

The motion to remove is based on the allegation of diversity of citizenship and separable controversy. The diversity of citizenship is not controverted. Does the complaint state a separable cause of action? This is the primary question presented.

The test of separability lies in the complaint and the cause of action therein stated. If the cause of action, as stated, is not separable the motion must be denied. Lackey v. R. R., 219 N. C., 195; Burleson v. Snipes, 211 N. C., 396, 190 S. E., 220; Rucker v. Snider Bros., Inc., 210 N. C., 777, 188 S. E., 405; Trust Co. v. R. R., 209 N. C., 304, 183…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Bost v. . MetcalfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Moses v. Town of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shaw v. . BarnardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Way v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API