Legal Opinion
Aristil v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF TAMPA
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided June 8, 1999No. 99-22-CIV-T-17FPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE
KOVACHEVICH, Chief Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant’s, The Housing Authority of the City of Tampa, Florida’s [hereinafter “Housing Authority”], Motion to Dismiss and Strike Plaintiffs’ Complaint, (Dkt.12), filed on March 17, 1999, and Plaintiffs’, Marlene Aristü’s and John D. Wilson’s, response thereto, (Dkt.15), filed on April 26,1999.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
A district court should not dismiss a complaint unless it appears, “beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dellita Johnson v. City of Detroit and City of Detroit Housing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Mallo v. Public Health Trust of Dade CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
- Johnson v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- LB III v. Housing Authority of LouisvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2004
- Dewakuku v. CuomoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.