Legal Opinion

Marquez v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 2000No. 99-263PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The major question raised by Jose Marquez (Marquez) is that the trial court lacked the requisite subject matter jurisdiction to try him for conspiracy. Marquez was convicted of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance; conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to deliver; and conspiracy to possess a controlled substance, all in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031 (Mi-chie 1997) and Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 85-7-1042 (Lexis 1999). Marquez asserts that, since the conspiracy was not entered into in Wyoming, and he committed no criminal acts in this state, Wyoming…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Gregory M. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Howard v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ernest Ray Watts v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Estrada-Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Janpol v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API