Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Rhodes, Adm.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1954PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a damage action for personal injuries, brought pursuant to the provision of § 115-1001, OCLA (ORS 80.110), generally known as “the guest statute”. It was commenced by Jack E. Bailey, as plaintiff against Ernest H. Rhodes, administrator of the estate of James A. Triplett, deceased, as defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $15,000; defendant appeals.

This action is brought against the personal representative of James A. Triplett, deceased, the alleged wrongdoer, as authorized by the provisions of § 8-904, OCLA, as amended by ch 519,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walker v. PennerOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Warren v. HynesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Prauss v. AdamskiOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. First Nat. Bank v. Fire Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Willoughby v. DriscollOregon Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ritter v. BEALSOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lemons v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Thomas v. DAD'S ROOT BEER, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Marshall v. MartinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API