Legal Opinion

United States v. Harold Philip Amos

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1977No. 76-1631PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

Harold Philip Amos was convicted of bank larceny (18 U.S.C. § 2113(b)) and bank robbery (18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)) and sentenced to terms of ten and twelve years, respectively, the sentences to be served concurrently. He appeals, asserting various grounds for reversal. He contends that both his post-arrest confession and the fruits of a purported consent search of his apartment were inadmissible at his trial. He also contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, there was a lack of sufficient evidence to support his conviction, and he was denied due process in the delay in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. HoisingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. United States v. Ricky Lee Woodrup, A/K/A Ricky Lee Woddrup, A/K/A Lee Woodrup, A/K/A Ricky L. Woodrup, A/K/A Rodney WoodrupCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  3. Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. United States v. Maurice Lynell SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Raymond WagstaffCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API