Harris v. Pierce
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Wayne Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGookins, J.
Assumpsit by Pierce against Harris, on a promissory note made by one Winebrener,- payable to Pierce, and indorsed by Harris. The declaration contains six counts. The first charges Harris as maker of the note; the second, third and fourth allege that Harris indorsed his name on the back of the note, and thereby guaranteed its payment, and that Winebrener, at the maturity of the note, was and still remained wholly insolvent. The fifth is like the second, third and fourth, with the additional averment of a special demand of payment upon Winebrener, four days after the note became due, and notice…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reynolds v. DouglassSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Wells v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
- Lewis v. BrewsterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1839
3Cited by7 opinions
- Drake v. MarkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- McMillan v. Bull's Head BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Snyder v. OatmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Pool v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Sill v. LeslieIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.