Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Bull's Head Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1869PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from tlie Rush. Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtErazer, C. J.

This was a suit by the Bull’s Head Bank *12against James T. and Samuel E. McMillan and James Goddard, upon a joint and several bond executed by them in a penalty of fifteen thousand dollars, with a condition reciting, that James T. McMillan had become a member of a certain firm in New York, rendering it probably necessary for him to use more funds in the business of the firm than he would have at command, and which he proposed to borrow ;• and then proceeding thus: “Now the foregoing bond is to be in force and binding upon us, according to its terms, for the full amount of any loans and advances…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Douglass v. HowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Douglass and Others v. Reynolds and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  3. Reynolds v. DouglassSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  4. Beekman v. HaleNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  5. Virden v. EllsworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Salmon Falls Bank v. LeyserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. LaRose v. Logansport National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Saint v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Graham v. RingoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  5. Anderson v. SpenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API