Legal Opinion
Czaplicki v. the Hoegh Silvercloud
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 11, 1956No. 342Published
1Opinion of the Court
351 U.S. 525 (1956)
CZAPLICKI
v.
THE HOEGH SILVERCLOUD ET AL.
No. 342.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued April 24, 1956.
Decided June 11, 1956.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Bernard Chazen argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Nathan Baker.
James M. Estabrook argued the cause for The Hoegh Silvercloud et al., respondents. With him on the brief was Francis X. Byrn.
Arthur J. Phelan argued the cause for the Hamilton Marine Contracting Co., Inc., respondent. On the brief was Raymond J. Scully.
Opinion of the Court by MR. JUSTICE HARLAN,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.