Rucktenwald v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, C. J.
On the trial of the action the evidence established the following facts. Shortly before noon on *613July 18, 1944, one of the defendant’s “battleship” type hopper freight cars loaded with sand was hauled by the defendant on its track to the top of the Pipkorn Company’s trestle which was twenty-five feet above the ground. The car was “spotted” there by defendant for Pipkorn to unload the sand through the car hoppers down through grilles between the railway track into Pipkorn’s bins beneath its trestle, from which it loaded sand onto its trucks. Pursuant to Pipkorn’s instructions such cars were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cummings v. National Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Ambrose v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Stimson v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Spencer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Semensky v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rucktenwald v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952