Legal Opinion

Rucktenwald v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1952Published

1Opinion of the Court

261 Wis. 611 (1952)

RUCKTENWALD, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Appellants,

vs.

CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 5, 1952.

June 3, 1952.

Arlo McKinnon of Milwaukee, for the appellants.

For the respondent there was a brief by Bender, Trump, McIntyre, Trimborn & Godfrey, attorneys, and Rodger S. Trump of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Rodger S. Trump.

FRITZ, C. J.

On the trial of the action the evidence established the following facts. Shortly before noon on July 18, 1944, one of the defendant's "battleship" type…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cummings v. National Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Ambrose v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Stimson v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Spencer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Semensky v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API