Legal Opinion
Wyatt v. Marinoff
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 27, 1928No. 17875PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEEHEE, C.
In the court below, where the parties appeared in their reverse order and will be here so referred to, Nick Marinoff, upon a verdict of the jury in an action on an injunction bond, recovered a judgment of $1,500 against B. S. Wyatt, the principal obligor in the bond.
Defendant complains of the judgment against him, first, as follows:
“The court erred in overruling plaintiff in error’s demurrer, objection to the introduction of evidence, demurrer to - the evidence, motion for a directed verdict and motion for a new trial, for the reason that defendant in error’s petition wholly failed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wilkinson v. First National Fire Insurance Co. of WorcesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Big Jack Mining Co. v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- City of Montpelier v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Carver Chiropractic College v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- NBI Services, Inc. v. WardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- First Nat. Bank of Healdton v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930