Legal Opinion

Wyatt v. Marinoff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 1928No. 17875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

In the court below, where the parties appeared in their reverse order and will be here so referred to, Nick Marinoff, upon a verdict of the jury in an action on an injunction bond, recovered a judgment of $1,500 against B. S. Wyatt, the principal obligor in the bond.

Defendant complains of the judgment against him, first, as follows:

“The court erred in overruling plaintiff in error’s demurrer, objection to the introduction of evidence, demurrer to - the evidence, motion for a directed verdict and motion for a new trial, for the reason that defendant in error’s petition wholly failed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Wilkinson v. First National Fire Insurance Co. of WorcesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Big Jack Mining Co. v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. City of Montpelier v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. Carver Chiropractic College v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. NBI Services, Inc. v. WardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. First Nat. Bank of Healdton v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API