Legal Opinion
Bakhuyzen v. National Rail Passenger Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided February 6, 1996No. 1:94-cv-00264PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON AMTRAK AND CHILES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO BAKHUYZEN AND DAVIS
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
These consolidated lawsuits arise out of a collision on March 10, 1993, between a truck carrying liquid propane and a National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) train. This matter is currently before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by Amtrak against Nancy Bakhuyzen and Mamie Davis, the plaintiffs in Case Nos. l:94-CV-264 and 1:94-CV-281. James Chiles has joined in Amtrak’s motion.
At the time of the accident Nicholas Bak-huyzen was driving a truck…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Anderson v. Wisconsin Central Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Hightower v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Seyler v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Veit v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.