Hightower v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
1 The issues in the present cause are as follows: (1) whether Pearl's state law negli-genee theories based upon adequacy of the warning devices, excessive train speed and "local hazard conditions" are preempted by federal law such that the trial court's instructions on these issues were improper and (2) if so, whether the scope of federal preemption extends to bar evidence of adequacy of warning devices, excessive train speed and "local hazard conditions," which is offered for purposes of comparative negligence and punitive damages; (8) whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. ShanklinSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bashir v. AmtrakCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Alcorn v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Anderson v. Wisconsin Central Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Mehl v. Canadian Pacific Railway, Ltd.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2006
- Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Moody v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007
- Peters v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.