Legal Opinion
Dudney v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1937No. L. A. 16028; L. A. 16030PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Olin N. MacKay and William E. Dudney are petitioners in two separate proceedings to review recommendations of the board of governors of The State Bar that each of them be disbarred from the practice of the law in the state of California.
In July, 1935, The State Bar in its proceeding, L. A. No. 785, issued a notice directing Dudney to show cause why he should not be disciplined for professional misconduct. This notice alleges that Dudney, well knowing that one A. Lee Graham was in fact an ex-convict, and was not and had never been a member of The State Bar of California nor entitled…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Mills v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Dudney v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by11 opinions
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Ettinger v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Crawford v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Jacobs v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.