Legal Opinion

Foster v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1971PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Claimant injured his shoulder and arm while working for an employer covered by the State Accident Insurance Fund. He was awarded a scheduled disability equal to 15 per cent loss of use of an arm. Claimant asked for a hearing. The hearing officer increased the scheduled award to 25 per cent loss of use of an arm and denied a request for an additional award for unscheduled disability to the shoulder. The Workmen’s Compensation Board and the circuit court both affirmed the award. Upon appeal to the Court of Appeals, that court, in addition to the scheduled disability for the loss of use of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Walker v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Lauhoff Grain Co. v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  3. Oregon State Employes Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Woodman v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Howard Univ. Hosp. v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API