Legal Opinion

Messner v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 20, 1984No. 83-2002PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Diana L. Messner (Diana) and John G. Messner (collectively, the Messners) appeal from an order for dismissal in favor of Briggs & Stratton Corporation (Briggs & Stratton). The Messners challenge the constitutionality of sec. 102.18(1) (bp), Stats, (part of the Worker’s Compensation Act), which authorizes, as the exclusive remedy for insurer or employer bad faith, the award to an employee of a “penalty” against the insurer or employer, or both. The Messners contend that the section violates their constitutional rights. The Messners also argue that even if sec. 102.18(1) (bp) is constitutional,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Stanhope v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Coleman v. American Universal Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Sharp v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Harris v. VernierMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Boyer v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Berg v. FallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API