Legal Opinion
Vitro Corp. of America v. Texas Vitrified Supply Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1962No. 7014PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE L. REESE, Jr., District Judge.
The trial court sustained a motion for summary judgment made by the appellees under Rule 56, Rules of Civil Procedure, after the issues were joined by complaint and answer and on the basis of depositions and answers to interrogatories.
The complaint insofar as material, reads as follows:
“3. On or about September 21, 1958, the Village of Ruidoso, New Mexico, solicited bids from the plaintiff and others for the construction of sewage treatment plant and sanitary sewer system according to plans and specifications prepared by Wilson & Co., Engineers,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Leavitt v. Fiberloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Worley v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Mustang Fuel Corporation, a Corporation v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Perfetti v. McGhan MedicalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Nalbandian v. Byron Jackson Pumps, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.