Lawrence v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Intervenors seek judicial review of a decision of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), remanding the respondent county’s denial of an application to verify that a go-kart track is a permissible nonconforming use. Lawrence v. Clackamas County, 40 Or LUBA 507 (2001). Intervenors assert that LUBA erred in its disposition because the county correctly denied petitioner’s application on the ground that it was barred by claim preclusion and issue preclusion. We affirm.
The basic facts are not in dispute. Petitioner Patricia Lawrence owns a parcel of property in Clackamas County on which she operates…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Lawrence v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aguilar v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- VanSpeybroeck v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Grabhorn v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Scott Inc. v. City of OntarioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Waste Not of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020