Legal Opinion

Williams v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 3, 1922No. 10792PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Greer County; T. p. -Clay, Judge. Action in replevin by Hattie Williams against Lee Williams to recover possession of a horse. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This Is an action in replevin instituted in the justice court before Milton Carver, a justice of the peace of Granite township, Greer county, Okla., by Hettie Williams, as plaintiff, to recover from Lee Williams, as defendant, specific personal property, to wit, a horse named Prince, of the value of $100.

A change of venue was granted to the justice court of T. P. Morrow, where the case was tried to a jury, which resulted in a verdict in favor' of the plaintiff for the return of the horse and for damages in the sum of $20. Lee Williams, as defendant, appealed to the district court of Greer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Archer v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Yingling v. RedwineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  3. Pringey v. GussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. Sanders v. C. R. I. & Pac. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  5. Norman v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boardman Co. v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Town of Red Fork v. Gantt-Baker Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Wommer v. WommerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Davis v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Cooper v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API