Pringey v. Guss
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Lincoln County; before John H. Burford, Trial Judge
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
BuRWELL, J.:
This is an action-by the plaintiffs in error against U. C. Guss to declare a resulting trust; it being the contention of the appellants that the appellee purchased the s. e. 1-4 of sec. 9, twp. 15, n. of r. 5 east in Lincoln county, Oklahoma from J. E. Ross, the former owner of the legal title with full knowledge that he had, prior thereto, sold it to these appellants, and received a part of the purchase price tberefor. The contract of sale under which appellants’ claim was signed in duplicate by Joseph C. Pringey, and Mrs. Ida Boss (wife of J. E. Boss), and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Kearney v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Shaw v. MasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Londoner v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1876
3Cited by15 opinions
- Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Landon v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Boardman Co. v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Farmers' State Bank v. EmpeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Hargrove v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.