Yingling v. Redwine
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of pawnee County; before Bay-ard T. Haimr, Trial Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burford C. J.:
The plaintiff in error, E. D. Yingling, brought his action in the probate court against the defendant in error, W. H. Eedwine, for forcible detainer, and to recover possession ,of lots one to eight inclusive, in- block thirty-five in the town of Pawnee, Oklahoma. Yirfgling recovered judgment in the probate court, and Eedwine appealed to the district court. Trial was there had to a jury, and after the plaintiff had introduced his evidence and rested, the defendant demurred to the evidence; the court sustained the demurrer, discharged the jury and gave…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Commercial Drilling Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Worley, Receiver v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Boardman Co. v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Sanders v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Wheeler v. American Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.