Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Draske

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 29, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The present proceeding propounds the problem as to the extent of the obligation of the court to compel and participate in the pubhcation and perpetuation of defamatory and presumptively hbelous testamentary statements.

The decedent died on April 14, 1936, leaving a document, admittedly duly, executed as a will, dated December 14, 1933. In its fourth item, after making certain bequests and a devise to a named beneficiary, it recited that the testatrix gave the indicated beneficiary “ no further interest in my estate, for the reason that,” then follows a four-line categorical…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BuechnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. In Re the Accounting of the United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Claim of Raymond v. Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Clapp v. . FullertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. In Re the Probate of the Will of O'NeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  2. In re the Estate of JohnstonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  3. Brown v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  4. In re the Estate of ScheckNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  5. In re the Estate of AngelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API