Legal Opinion
Oker v. Ameritech Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2000No. 99-270PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
In Bellian v. Bicron Corp. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 517, 634 N.E.2d 608, we held that an age-discrimination claim brought pursuant to R.C. Chapter 4112 must be initiated within the one-hundred-eighty-day statute of limitations period set forth in former R.C. 4112.02(N). Here, all parties agree that the claims asserted by Oker are governed by the one-hundred-eighty-day statute of limitations period provided in R.C. 4112.02(N). Therefore, the issue before the court is when the applicable statute of limitations period for an age-discrimination claim brought under R.C. Chapter 4112 begins to run.
For…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bellian v. Bicron Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Teamsters Local Union 377 v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Board of Edn. of Lordstown Local School District v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by13 opinions
- Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Vollemans v. Town of WallingfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Kozma v. Aep Energy Ser., Unpublished Decision (3-17-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Williams v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Juergens v. House of LaRose, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.