Legal Opinion

Gimbel Bros. v. Swift

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided February 9, 1970PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIrving Younger, J.

This case involves a challenge to the validity of a familiar legal device.

Cecil Swift is Carl Swift’s father. Carl owed $714.43 to plaintiff. On August 21, 1969, father and son met with plaintiff’s attorney. The three of them executed a document of the kind commonly employed by the commercial community in such situations. It is captioned:

Civil Court of the City of New York County of New York

Cimbel Bros., Inc., Plaintiff, • — against — Cecil Swift and Carl Swift, Defendants.

The body of the document is a stipulation that ‘ ‘ the above entitled action is hereby settled ’ ’ on terms set forth in…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Covenant Health & Rehabilitation of Picayune, LP v. Estate of Moulds Ex Rel. BraddockMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Croce v. KurnitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. Lacie Cyless Smith v. Express Check Advance of Mississippi, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Envases Venezolanos, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. Lowell v. First National Bank of Cape Cod (In Re Lowell)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API