Cahill v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
After trial, a jury in this motor vehicle accident case returned a special verdict finding that the concurrent negligence of both drivers of two truck transports caused a collision and resulting damages to plaintiffs. In response to post-trial motions by defendant Indianhead Truck Lines, Inc., the court upheld the jury’s determination, and said defendant alone appeals.1 The crucial question presented is whether the negligence of defendant Paul Peterson, driver of the truck which collided *28with the rear of plaintiff John Cahill’s automobile, was as a matter of law a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Kroeger v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Thelen v. SpilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Seward v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Barrett v. Nash Finch Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hedlund v. HedlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Yellow Taxi Co. of Minneapolis v. MacMillanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969