Cahill v. Lyda
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND
POWERS, Justice.
Marjorie Cahill sued the record owners of a 15.332-acre tract of land to establish in herself a prescriptive title under the ten-year statute. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. § 1, art. 5510, at 1554 (1925) [since repealed, now codified as amended as Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 16.026 (1986 and Supp. 1991) j.1 The trial court concluded she did not establish the elements of her claim, and rendered judgment accordingly. In Cahill’s appeal, she brings two points of error: (1) that she established the necessary elements as a matter of law; and (2) that the trial court’s failure to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rhodes v. CahillTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
- Wall v. East Texas Teachers Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Bennett v. McKrellTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Key v. W. T. Grant CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fletcher v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Holland, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1997
- Fletcher v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Marcilea Fletcher v. Allison Jennifer Blair, Patricia Huntington, A/K/A Patience Huntington, Brett James Strasma & Paula Kay Galbraith, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994