Legal Opinion

Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1943No. Motion No. 15799. Cause No. 7857PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander

In the above cause G. 0. Reaugh et al, petitioners, have filed in this Court a motion to retax the costs. The facts are these: The petitioners, G. 0. Reaugh et al, recovered a judgment, including the costs in the trial court, against the respondents, McCollum Exploration Company et al. McCollum Exploration Company et al, appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals. The bill of costs originally filed with the transcript in the Court of Civil Appeals did not include any item for the cost of the statement of facts. Thereafter the appellants therein caused the clerk of the trial court to make up a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Patton v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Allen v. WoodsonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Pullman Co. v. Hays WifeTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Harris v. Monroe Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Irving v. Fort Worth State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston & Southeast Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Wood v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Wohlfahrt v. Holloway, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. County of El Paso v. Dorado, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006
  5. Williams v. Colthurst, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API