Legal Opinion

Jack & Jill Togs, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 5, 1959No. C.D. 2092PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Plaintiff, a domestic manufacturer of children’s wear, has invoked the provisions of section 516(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 TJ.S.C. section 1516(b), to protest the collector’s classification of an importation of cotton corduroy overalls, etc., within the provisions of paragraph 919 of said act, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, for wearing apparel, in chief value of cotton, with the consequent assessment of duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem.

It is here claimed that said merchandise is properly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cornet Stores v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API