Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 13, 1993No. 92-1074PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

This case presents an issue of statutory construction— whether the fiduciary standards stated in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) govern an insurance company’s conduct in relation to certain annuity contracts. Fiduciary status under ERISA generally attends the management of “plan assets.” The statute, however, contains no comprehensive definition of “plan assets.” Our task in this case is to determine the bounds of a statutory exclusion from “plan asset” categorization, an exclusion Congress prescribed for “guaranteed benefit policies].”

The question before us arises…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. Faber v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Holloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. De Buono v. NYSA-ILA Medical & Clinical Services Fund Ex Rel. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API