Legal Opinion

Sate v. Elliot Russell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 11, 2016No. 2014-425Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Note: Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal. ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2014-425 FEBRUARY TERM, 2016 State of Vermont } APPEALED FROM: } } Superior Court, Bennington Unit, v. } Criminal Division } } Elliot Russell } DOCKET NO. 1406-12-07 Bncr Trial Judge: David A. Howard In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter: Defendant appeals from a decision of the superior court, criminal division, denying his motion for a new trial pursuant to Vermont Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. We affirm. In 2009, defendant was convicted by a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. YohSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. State v. RussellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API