State v. Sinclair
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Defendant filed a petition for a writ of eoram nobis in the criminal division, seeking to vacate a conviction from 1993 on the ground that his plea was not entered voluntarily. The court denied the motion, concluding there was no basis for a collateral attack on defendant’s plea. Defendant appeals, arguing his plea should be vacated because the sentencing court did not substantially comply with Vermont Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. We affirm.
¶ 2. In October 1992, the State charged defendant with assault and robbery. Defendant entered a plea agreement with the State in which he agreed to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- People v. Hyung Joon KimCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of West Virginia v. Orville M. HuttonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
- Trujillo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Aaron CadySupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In Re AguiarVermont Superior Court · 2026
- Lumumba v. State of VermontVermont Superior Court · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.