Legal Opinion

State v. Sinclair

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 8, 2012No. 2010-475PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Defendant filed a petition for a writ of eoram nobis in the criminal division, seeking to vacate a conviction from 1993 on the ground that his plea was not entered voluntarily. The court denied the motion, concluding there was no basis for a collateral attack on defendant’s plea. Defendant appeals, arguing his plea should be vacated because the sentencing court did not substantially comply with Vermont Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. We affirm.

¶ 2. In October 1992, the State charged defendant with assault and robbery. Defendant entered a plea agreement with the State in which he agreed to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. People v. Hyung Joon KimCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of West Virginia v. Orville M. HuttonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Trujillo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. Aaron CadySupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. In Re AguiarVermont Superior Court · 2026
  5. Lumumba v. State of VermontVermont Superior Court · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API