Legal Opinion

State v. Russell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 11, 2011No. 09-232PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendant appeals his jury conviction for aggravated assault, arguing: (1) it was error to admit certain correspondence he sent while incarcerated because its content was irrelevant and prejudicial; (2) the evidence presented was not sufficient to support a jury verdict of guilty; and (3) the court’s denial of his request for a jury charge on the lesser offense of simple assault was in error. We affirm.

¶ 2. This case arose from a December 10, 2007 incident at the Redd Rascal Pub in Bennington where defendant was drinking with a group of companions, including Henry Dummeyer. The victim…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. DelisleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  2. State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. State v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  5. State v. ForbesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BournSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  2. Kneebinding, Inc. v. Richard HowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  3. State v. CahillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. State v. Allen PrueSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  5. State v. John R. Lyddy IISupreme Court of Vermont · 2025

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API