State v. Russell
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Defendant appeals his jury conviction for aggravated assault, arguing: (1) it was error to admit certain correspondence he sent while incarcerated because its content was irrelevant and prejudicial; (2) the evidence presented was not sufficient to support a jury verdict of guilty; and (3) the court’s denial of his request for a jury charge on the lesser offense of simple assault was in error. We affirm.
¶ 2. This case arose from a December 10, 2007 incident at the Redd Rascal Pub in Bennington where defendant was drinking with a group of companions, including Henry Dummeyer. The victim…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. DelisleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- State v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- State v. ForbesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. BournSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Kneebinding, Inc. v. Richard HowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- State v. CahillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- State v. Allen PrueSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- State v. John R. Lyddy IISupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.