Culver v. Gillian
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). One of the de-. fenses to the suit is that the defendant has title to the lots in question by adverse possession. It will be observed that he does not claim to have entered into possession of the lots under color of title. In cases of adverse possession under color of title the actual possession, by presumption of law, is constructively extended to the limits defined in the paper conveyance which gives color of title. In the case, however, of adverse possession without color of title, the adverse possession is limited to the land actually adversely occupied.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Norwood v. MayoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Campbell v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Thornton v. St. Louis Refrigerator & Wooden Gutter Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
3Cited by21 opinions
- Utley v. RuffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Skelly Oil Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Stricker v. BrittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Cooper v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Lollar v. ApplebySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.