Legal Opinion

Havens v. Foskett

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1927No. Docket No. 2994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The plaintiff, as assignee of Central Finance Company, a corporation, brought this action to recover the amount of six trade acceptances drawn by J. B. Vallen, doing business as Cadillac Manufacturing Company, upon defendants and duly accepted by them. They are all of one series, dated February 2, 1923, and payable 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, and 90 days respectively after date. They are all identical in amount and in terms except as to time of payment. The first one of the series reads as follows:

“Trade Acceptance

$105.00 San Francisco, California Feby 2, 1923.

Date of Sale.

To Ives Hdw Co

Dealers Name.

6…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Popp v. Exchange BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Goodale v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Bright v. OffieldWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Iowa National Bank v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. ForemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Cook v. HuntleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Johnston v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API