Legal Opinion
Gresham v. Schlumberger Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 17, 1995No. 1931223PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tommy Gresham appeals from a judgment based on a directed verdict in favor of the defendant Schlumberger Industries, Inc., on Gresham's claim seeking damages for an alleged retaliatory discharge. We reverse and remand.
In December 1989, Tommy Gresham injured himself while working at Schlumberger's plant. Following back surgery, his physician gave him a 10% impairment rating. He returned to work in July 1990. According to Gresham, he was again injured in October 1990, but continued to work until December of that year, when his back condition forced him to again seek medical attention. In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Culbreth v. Woodham Plumbing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Continental Eagle Corp. v. MokrzyckiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Pushkin v. Regents of the University of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gold Kist, Inc. v. HoodCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Beaulieu of America, Inc. v. KilgoreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Alexander v. Jitney Jungle Stores of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Meadowcraft Industries, Inc. v. PriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Gresham v. Schlumberger Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.