Legal Opinion
Concerned Tenants of Father Panik Village v. Pierce
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 9, 1988No. Civ. B-87-809 (TFGD)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
DALY, Chief Judge.
The Concerned Tenants Association of Father Panik Village, along with thirteen named residents of Father Panik Village, have filed a class action suit in the above-captioned matter on behalf of more than 700 resident families to redress the allegedly dangerous, indecent, and unsanitary living conditions at Father Panik Village, a low-income housing project in Bridgeport, Connecticut. In particular, plaintiffs allege that defendants have failed to repair broken windows, doors, electrical fixtures, appliances, radiators, pipes, showers,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Anderson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- McNeill v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- National Leased Housing Association, and 189 Named v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Ayala v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Charlie H. v. WhitmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.