Legal Opinion
State v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N OF TEXAS
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 18, 1992No. 3-90-259-CV, 3-90-260-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Justice.
Central Power and Light Company (“CP & L”) and Houston Lighting and Power Company (“HL & P”) applied to the Public Utility Commission (the “Commission”) for deferred-accounting treatment of certain costs associated with a new nuclear power plant in Matagorda County, Texas, known as the South Texas Project. The Commission granted the applications, and the district court upheld the Commission’s orders granting the requests. The State of Texas, on behalf of certain State agencies, and the Office of Public Utility Counsel (“OPC”) appeal that judgment to this Court. We will affirm…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility Rates v. Public Utility Commission of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- City of El Paso v. Public Utility Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Texas-New Mexico Power Co. v. Texas Industrial Energy ConsumersTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Mahon v. VandygriffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Public Utility Com'n of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Star Houston, Inc. v. Texas Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- El Paso Electric Co. v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- City of Houston v. VitekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas And Charles and Janie Pederson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.