Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Vitek

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1993No. A14-92-00592-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Lawrence Vitek, awarding him back pay and attorney’s fees. The City of Houston claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the award. We disagree, and affirm the judgment.

On November 14, 1984, Lawrence Vitek was re-assigned from his position as Sludge Processor III at the Northside Wastewater Treatment Plant, to replace the “Section Chief” at the Process Operations Branch located the Sims Bayou Wastewater Treatment Sludge Disposal Plant. His supervisor, Mr. Lonnie…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Stone v. Texas Liquor Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Alford v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  4. North Alamo Water Supply Corp. v. Texas Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Sells v. RooseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John Acosta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  2. William D. Layton v. City of Fort Worth, City of Fort Worth Employees' Retirement Fund, and Board of City of Fort Worth Employees' Retirement Fund, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API