Legal Opinion

Emerson v. Carras

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1977No. 7626SC745PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The sales contract specified that plaintiffs were purchasing “2927 Sharon Road Charlotte, North Carolina, including house, lot and all improvements thereon.” The court allowed parol evidence to show that plaintiffs understood and were told that the lot had dimensions of 213 feet X 201 feet and contained approximately one acre. This defendants assign as error, the exceptions taken to the overruling of their objections being grouped under assignment of error No. 1. We note at the outset that objections appear at only four places in the record and that interspersed at various…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Wilson County Board of Education v. LammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Logue v. Von AlmenIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. King v. HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Miller v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vestal v. VestalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Passmore v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. FCX, INC. v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Vickery v. OLIN HILL CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Bowers v. OlfCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API