Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Buhl
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
*744The present appeal in this summary process action stems from the foreclosure of real property located at 12 Casner Road in East Haddam. The self-represented defendants, Paul Buhl and Luce Buhl,1 *487*745appeal from the judgment of possession rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Federal National Mortgage Association. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court (1) improperly determined that they did not commence an action pursuant to General Statutes § 47-36aa (a), (2) improperly determined that the deed to the subject property was valid despite notarial defects, (3) abused its discretion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Constantine v. SchneiderConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Comm'r of Emergency Servs. & Pub. Prot. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- ARS Investors II 2012-1 HVB, LLC v. Crystal, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- McCarthy v. Chromium Process Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wittman v. Intense Movers, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Fezollari v. JauzovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Berger v. DeutermannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Rescia Ch. 7 Trustee v. Freedom Mortgage CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2021