Legal Opinion

Kilpper v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1999No. S-7696PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

Stephen Kilpper acknowledged paternity of a child he did not father. Based on this acknowledgment, the superior court entered a judgment establishing his paternity. Years later, when the Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED)sought to enforce Kilpper’s support obligation, Kilpper moved to disestablish paternity and proved that he was not the biological father. The court granted Kilpper’s motion prospectively; despite Kilp-per’s request for a hearing on “an equitable defense to the[] claimed arrearages,” the court summarily ordered him to pay all accrued support. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Matthews v. MatthewsAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Dewey v. DeweyAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Valdez v. ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. TrihubAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. MaxwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. ButtonAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Atcherian v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Kilpper v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API